Tagged with: Leadership • rules of engagement
As a Project leader you are dumped in an organization you have never seen before. You get people assigned you don’t know. The organization prescribes methods and tools you don’t like. And of course, there are a gazillion of unwritten rules.
Welcome to your project life.
You run on partial Information, partial Influence and partial capability.
But how do you actually run a project under these circumstances?

Answer: Project Leadership.
The elements of (my version of) Project Leadership are:
- Goals and Means on individual, project and organizational level
- Alignment of goals and means on all levels by communication
Goals
A project has a goal, an objective. This is part of the larger context of the goals of the organization.
Individuals have goals, ambitions, interests. If peoples goals are met, they work happy; if not, they don’t.
Job for the Project leader is to align the goals on all levels. Keep on tweaking and adjusting. Make sure everyone understands. Make sure they are all in balance.
Means
Means are the strategies to reach the goal. This is the set of rituals, artifacts and values shared among the group, the organization and individual. The culture.
The culture can be used to create a strong group; it can be in conflict with the dominant structure.
Job for the Project leader is to align the means on all levels for maximal effectiveness. Balancing deviance with compliance. Making sure there are rules of engagement the entire team uses.
Communication
You think that if you are dropped into foreign territory like this, you would get a lot of equipment.
Sorry.
You get your Swiss Army knife: communication.
But in the end, that was all MacGyver needed.
You’ve really nailed it here. Alignment of goals is key to project success. Add to that whatever tweaks you can make to the culture to support it & you have a win-win situation. Biggest problem we have here is shifting priorities & having key resources pulled off to fix legacy problems. It’s hard to align the goals when the goals keep changing. By keeping everyone focused on the same goal, things get done, & they get done well. Shorter iterations help, because they provide an opportunity to refocus.
I love your swiss army knife analogy – so true. I would add that the healthiest cultures are those that embrace conflict.
So true. You are insightful.
@Ray: thanks for the comment. and great addition about the short iterations and refocus!
@Christina: yeah, facing and embracing conflict will make everyones intentions and needs transparant.
Do you have some tips how to stimlate this?
So what are the actionable outcomes to perform these desired results.
Seems awful “motherhood and apple pie” to me.
Yes aligning goals is good. Yes fulfilling the means is good.
HOW in a specific domains and context would you suggest these be executed?