<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Project Management Is Dead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.projectshrink.com/project-management-is-dead-66.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.projectshrink.com/project-management-is-dead-66.html</link>
	<description>Welcome To Shrinkonia.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:24:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vasoula</title>
		<link>http://www.projectshrink.com/project-management-is-dead-66.html#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Vasoula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareprojects.org/project-management-is-dead-66.html#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Your article &#039;Project Management is Dead&#039; is far more meaningful now than ever before. Two years on into 2009 the year of economic downturn, and more redundancies by the day jobs are not really available contrary to online engines advertising; have any one noted that everyone is being called a Project Manager now days!  from Construction PM, Technical PM, Developer PM, HR PM, Business Analyst PM, etc. These PM roles are very specific and saves organisations lots of money by not seeking out the true Project Manager that Leads and Manages a project including technical resources to implementation.  What is expected by clients today is to get a technical person for example to also Project Manage. Project Management is a descipline and it is process driven regardless of which methodology is being applied - a certification does not necessarily produce the best Project Managers, it will only demonstrate that he or she has passed the exam. In real environments that PM certification will be useless if the PM is not a leader and a manager, they dont have to be the expert subject matter that is for the technical teams to do that as part of the overall project managed and driven by the Project Manager.

I do feel organisations today have lost sight of the good Project Managers and especially those that started Project Management before the breeding of formal methodologies.  It is all about the human factor, the approach, making things happen, it is not about whether one knows .NET, Oracle, Digital media, and so on, these are just solutions that form part of the overall Project Management umbrella.  The techies are a requirement to Projects and that is all.

Yes, unfortunately the Project Manager is dying of death and by year 2011 my prediction is that the traditional diverse project managers will not exist not as we have known them for the past 10 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your article &#8216;Project Management is Dead&#8217; is far more meaningful now than ever before. Two years on into 2009 the year of economic downturn, and more redundancies by the day jobs are not really available contrary to online engines advertising; have any one noted that everyone is being called a Project Manager now days!  from Construction PM, Technical PM, Developer PM, HR PM, Business Analyst PM, etc. These PM roles are very specific and saves organisations lots of money by not seeking out the true Project Manager that Leads and Manages a project including technical resources to implementation.  What is expected by clients today is to get a technical person for example to also Project Manage. Project Management is a descipline and it is process driven regardless of which methodology is being applied &#8211; a certification does not necessarily produce the best Project Managers, it will only demonstrate that he or she has passed the exam. In real environments that PM certification will be useless if the PM is not a leader and a manager, they dont have to be the expert subject matter that is for the technical teams to do that as part of the overall project managed and driven by the Project Manager.</p>
<p>I do feel organisations today have lost sight of the good Project Managers and especially those that started Project Management before the breeding of formal methodologies.  It is all about the human factor, the approach, making things happen, it is not about whether one knows .NET, Oracle, Digital media, and so on, these are just solutions that form part of the overall Project Management umbrella.  The techies are a requirement to Projects and that is all.</p>
<p>Yes, unfortunately the Project Manager is dying of death and by year 2011 my prediction is that the traditional diverse project managers will not exist not as we have known them for the past 10 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumit Roy</title>
		<link>http://www.projectshrink.com/project-management-is-dead-66.html#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Sumit Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareprojects.org/project-management-is-dead-66.html#comment-193</guid>
		<description>Very very intriguing issue. Well, my recent experience in managing a project, where the clients were 3 associates. 2 in Vancouver, BC, Canada; and the other in Beijing, China. My Sales team in Chicago, IL, USA and I in Kolkata, India. The best way I found out to conduct the Project was to post a mail for even the smallest of issues. Basecamp from 37 signals helped me with that surely. Also, voice interaction I believe is irreplacebale since their are language proficiency barriers in people involved in a project. Recently I have started to record the skype conversations with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mp3-wma-recorder.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.mp3-wma-recorder.com/&lt;/a&gt; or I have heard of the Skype Recorder. Recording helps the investigators... are we any less?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very very intriguing issue. Well, my recent experience in managing a project, where the clients were 3 associates. 2 in Vancouver, BC, Canada; and the other in Beijing, China. My Sales team in Chicago, IL, USA and I in Kolkata, India. The best way I found out to conduct the Project was to post a mail for even the smallest of issues. Basecamp from 37 signals helped me with that surely. Also, voice interaction I believe is irreplacebale since their are language proficiency barriers in people involved in a project. Recently I have started to record the skype conversations with <a href="http://www.mp3-wma-recorder.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mp3-wma-recorder.com/</a> or I have heard of the Skype Recorder. Recording helps the investigators&#8230; are we any less?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Project Management Is Dead : PM Stories</title>
		<link>http://www.projectshrink.com/project-management-is-dead-66.html#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Project Management Is Dead : PM Stories</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareprojects.org/project-management-is-dead-66.html#comment-192</guid>
		<description>[...] Ñ‚Ð¾Ð²Ð° ÑÑ‚Ñ€Ð°ÑˆÐ½Ð¾ Ð·Ð°Ð³Ð»Ð°Ð²Ð¸Ðµ Ðµ Ð¿ÑƒÐ±Ð»Ð¸ÐºÑƒÐ²Ð°Ð» ÑÐ²Ð¾ÑÑ‚Ð° ÑÑ‚Ð°Ñ‚Ð¸Ñ Bas de Baar Ð¾Ñ‚ Ð±Ð»Ð¾Ð³Ð° Project [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ñ‚Ð¾Ð²Ð° ÑÑ‚Ñ€Ð°ÑˆÐ½Ð¾ Ð·Ð°Ð³Ð»Ð°Ð²Ð¸Ðµ Ðµ Ð¿ÑƒÐ±Ð»Ð¸ÐºÑƒÐ²Ð°Ð» ÑÐ²Ð¾ÑÑ‚Ð° ÑÑ‚Ð°Ñ‚Ð¸Ñ Bas de Baar Ð¾Ñ‚ Ð±Ð»Ð¾Ð³Ð° Project [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craig</title>
		<link>http://www.projectshrink.com/project-management-is-dead-66.html#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareprojects.org/project-management-is-dead-66.html#comment-191</guid>
		<description>Before you define the new project management let me know what a project is.

Things that are projects today willbecome operational in the future (eg minor-medium enahcements to systems)and things that are operational management areas will become projectised (e.g. the new marketing campaign.)

At the same time programme management is developing s a discipline.  This is the art of not just managing a series of related projects but of managing the whole sphere of activties that are taking your business from where it is today to where it needs to be in the future.

While the world economy and sociology continue to change there ill be a continuing growth of project management.

Lastly; where is the sociology in all this?  You are right; it&#039;s ben lft off the list. Possibly on purpose.

The technical aspects of project management aer there as the toolkit.  The people side of project management may just be &quot;management&quot; and for that you need to go to the management theorists and practitioners and see how to best organise, motivate and reward your teams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before you define the new project management let me know what a project is.</p>
<p>Things that are projects today willbecome operational in the future (eg minor-medium enahcements to systems)and things that are operational management areas will become projectised (e.g. the new marketing campaign.)</p>
<p>At the same time programme management is developing s a discipline.  This is the art of not just managing a series of related projects but of managing the whole sphere of activties that are taking your business from where it is today to where it needs to be in the future.</p>
<p>While the world economy and sociology continue to change there ill be a continuing growth of project management.</p>
<p>Lastly; where is the sociology in all this?  You are right; it&#8217;s ben lft off the list. Possibly on purpose.</p>
<p>The technical aspects of project management aer there as the toolkit.  The people side of project management may just be &#8220;management&#8221; and for that you need to go to the management theorists and practitioners and see how to best organise, motivate and reward your teams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Project Shrink: The Blog : Blog Overview</title>
		<link>http://www.projectshrink.com/project-management-is-dead-66.html#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Project Shrink: The Blog : Blog Overview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 07:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareprojects.org/project-management-is-dead-66.html#comment-190</guid>
		<description>[...] functions as an index to key postings on my blog. Look at it as a Table Of Contents. I recommend this posting and this posting as a start. It will also explain why the index is structured the way it [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] functions as an index to key postings on my blog. Look at it as a Table Of Contents. I recommend this posting and this posting as a start. It will also explain why the index is structured the way it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diego Parrilla</title>
		<link>http://www.projectshrink.com/project-management-is-dead-66.html#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Diego Parrilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareprojects.org/project-management-is-dead-66.html#comment-189</guid>
		<description>Good post. Managing projects I feel like driving a car faster and faster every day. Better tools, faster cycles. But the person using the tools -driving the car- can crash the project just like crashing a car. Is the Project Manager fault? Yes and no, since tools let you go faster and... safer? Inertia is bigger and the time to respond to events shorter. May be we are reaching the limits of the people supercharging them with wonderful technology and tools...
Have you seen Blackberry owners reacting to the beeps of the device like Pavlov&#039;s dogs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. Managing projects I feel like driving a car faster and faster every day. Better tools, faster cycles. But the person using the tools -driving the car- can crash the project just like crashing a car. Is the Project Manager fault? Yes and no, since tools let you go faster and&#8230; safer? Inertia is bigger and the time to respond to events shorter. May be we are reaching the limits of the people supercharging them with wonderful technology and tools&#8230;<br />
Have you seen Blackberry owners reacting to the beeps of the device like Pavlov&#8217;s dogs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne</title>
		<link>http://www.projectshrink.com/project-management-is-dead-66.html#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 17:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareprojects.org/project-management-is-dead-66.html#comment-188</guid>
		<description>Technology and Project Management -

Project Mgmt as we know it...will be completely different than in the 1900&#039;s. Each person will become a project manager, but won&#039;t call him/herself that. Technology will be the backend of each and every business, that uses technology. Sociology will be the human interaction through this medium, to not conquer the world, but to embrace the peoples of the world and bring them into fruitful living situations where they can succeed in life by being helped, encouraged, taught, nurtured.

Technology, and the people running it, will have to learn compassion, and we all will have to work together, so we will each be managing ourselves, rather than projects. If I gave you the tools, you would be picking my brain, and quite frankly, you will be developing the tools yourselves through the much less complicated apps that come forward in the next few decades (yes, that long).

Besides, my brain is filled with many ideas, I&#039;m a writer, and prefer to bring together people with ideas.

You will be the backbone of the future, the tools will be ones you create, develop, harness and bring into being, as expressions of function. You are all of you working together, learning, doing, being.

There&#039;s more, but rather than go religious on everyone, study who was most compassionate on the earth, how they accomplished this compassion by being and walking among the people, and study what they said and apply that to technology, your life, and the world.  Then dominion becomes not a negative word, and not control, but a working together of all forces and lives to create peace, joy, love, harmony, and more life.

Okay, so this seems like a tangent, where is the Project Management truths you are seeking...well, look to the greatest Project Manager of all, and it will all become clear!

Where will technology be in the next few decades?  Will we create Artificial Life (AI) via these computers we use daily? Hmmm....

Seems I am answering a question with a question.  Again.

As to ever-increasing complexity in the technological tools we use, I see a trend the opposite way. The tools themselves will become standardized, but there will be several standards, different ops, different back-ends, different front-ends, different apps. Each group of folks working together will have to agree on those apps working together also, so that will be where the complexity comes in managing the people to the apps.

And I really hate to give it away, what I see, but database management and apps that tie into those databases are going to be crucial in the manipulation of technological data in the future.  Simplify it, do the databases as spreadsheets if you can and get better software to tie spreadsheets into databases and websites...there has got to be better software for this written (okay, enough of my complaint, uh, suggestion).

Don&#039;t let it overwhelm you (nor I), it&#039;s one line of code at a time, one web page at a time, one website at a time, one person at a time.

Oh, wait, with conference calls that&#039;s not true anymore, but we still have what is known as the &quot;talking stick&quot; approach to communication - only one person can be heard at a time, therefore only one person has the talking stick at a time.  But with so many brains thinking about what is being said, it is taking more self-control to formulate ideas into work, into existence.

That is where Project Management is headed, yet that appears to be glorious, as we learn more, do more, and are more, for and with each other.

Ciao,

Suzanne Belle Lowry

Anacortes, WA USA

(New website coming soon, just got married, name change changes everything!)

Copyright 2007 Suzanne Belle Lowry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technology and Project Management -</p>
<p>Project Mgmt as we know it&#8230;will be completely different than in the 1900&#8242;s. Each person will become a project manager, but won&#8217;t call him/herself that. Technology will be the backend of each and every business, that uses technology. Sociology will be the human interaction through this medium, to not conquer the world, but to embrace the peoples of the world and bring them into fruitful living situations where they can succeed in life by being helped, encouraged, taught, nurtured.</p>
<p>Technology, and the people running it, will have to learn compassion, and we all will have to work together, so we will each be managing ourselves, rather than projects. If I gave you the tools, you would be picking my brain, and quite frankly, you will be developing the tools yourselves through the much less complicated apps that come forward in the next few decades (yes, that long).</p>
<p>Besides, my brain is filled with many ideas, I&#8217;m a writer, and prefer to bring together people with ideas.</p>
<p>You will be the backbone of the future, the tools will be ones you create, develop, harness and bring into being, as expressions of function. You are all of you working together, learning, doing, being.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s more, but rather than go religious on everyone, study who was most compassionate on the earth, how they accomplished this compassion by being and walking among the people, and study what they said and apply that to technology, your life, and the world.  Then dominion becomes not a negative word, and not control, but a working together of all forces and lives to create peace, joy, love, harmony, and more life.</p>
<p>Okay, so this seems like a tangent, where is the Project Management truths you are seeking&#8230;well, look to the greatest Project Manager of all, and it will all become clear!</p>
<p>Where will technology be in the next few decades?  Will we create Artificial Life (AI) via these computers we use daily? Hmmm&#8230;.</p>
<p>Seems I am answering a question with a question.  Again.</p>
<p>As to ever-increasing complexity in the technological tools we use, I see a trend the opposite way. The tools themselves will become standardized, but there will be several standards, different ops, different back-ends, different front-ends, different apps. Each group of folks working together will have to agree on those apps working together also, so that will be where the complexity comes in managing the people to the apps.</p>
<p>And I really hate to give it away, what I see, but database management and apps that tie into those databases are going to be crucial in the manipulation of technological data in the future.  Simplify it, do the databases as spreadsheets if you can and get better software to tie spreadsheets into databases and websites&#8230;there has got to be better software for this written (okay, enough of my complaint, uh, suggestion).</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t let it overwhelm you (nor I), it&#8217;s one line of code at a time, one web page at a time, one website at a time, one person at a time.</p>
<p>Oh, wait, with conference calls that&#8217;s not true anymore, but we still have what is known as the &#8220;talking stick&#8221; approach to communication &#8211; only one person can be heard at a time, therefore only one person has the talking stick at a time.  But with so many brains thinking about what is being said, it is taking more self-control to formulate ideas into work, into existence.</p>
<p>That is where Project Management is headed, yet that appears to be glorious, as we learn more, do more, and are more, for and with each other.</p>
<p>Ciao,</p>
<p>Suzanne Belle Lowry</p>
<p>Anacortes, WA USA</p>
<p>(New website coming soon, just got married, name change changes everything!)</p>
<p>Copyright 2007 Suzanne Belle Lowry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Project Shrink: The Blog : My Current Model For PM</title>
		<link>http://www.projectshrink.com/project-management-is-dead-66.html#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Project Shrink: The Blog : My Current Model For PM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 16:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareprojects.org/project-management-is-dead-66.html#comment-187</guid>
		<description>[...] Project Shrink: The Blog &#8220;Projects Are About Humans, Now Deal With That!&#8221;      The must-have handbook for &quot;accidential project managers&quot; - those who have project management roles suddenly thrust upon them. More...       &#171; Project Management Is Dead [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Project Shrink: The Blog &#8220;Projects Are About Humans, Now Deal With That!&#8221;      The must-have handbook for &#8220;accidential project managers&#8221; &#8211; those who have project management roles suddenly thrust upon them. More&#8230;       &laquo; Project Management Is Dead [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bas</title>
		<link>http://www.projectshrink.com/project-management-is-dead-66.html#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Bas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 12:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareprojects.org/project-management-is-dead-66.html#comment-186</guid>
		<description>True. But there must be some underlying model, process or whatever. The tools must be based upon some assumptions. There must be some explanations on why tools will work or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True. But there must be some underlying model, process or whatever. The tools must be based upon some assumptions. There must be some explanations on why tools will work or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pawel Brodzinski</title>
		<link>http://www.projectshrink.com/project-management-is-dead-66.html#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Pawel Brodzinski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 09:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwareprojects.org/project-management-is-dead-66.html#comment-185</guid>
		<description>Controversial title, but ground you describe is true. Project management is ever-morphing discipline. It was, it is and it will be. One thing is geographical challenges which are brought recently. Another is constant search for the best methods to put it all together in a predictable manner. Growing complexity and number of projects are also on the list.

Yes, in a decade from now project management will look different from what we see now, but it won&#039;t be dead. We&#039;ll adjust the process to the new environment, like we always do.

And to answer your need - I believe you look in the wrong place. I think there&#039;s no project management process which will help us sort the situation out. The answer lays in tools which will help to deal with communication among people spread all over the world. Think, teleconferencing tools are still very poor quality or very expensive (and even then, they aren&#039;t very mobile). Our collaboration still relies on emails which aren&#039;t always the best way of contact. Internet enabled spreading teams geographically but tools which would cover holes brought by the model are yet to appear. In my opinion that is the answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Controversial title, but ground you describe is true. Project management is ever-morphing discipline. It was, it is and it will be. One thing is geographical challenges which are brought recently. Another is constant search for the best methods to put it all together in a predictable manner. Growing complexity and number of projects are also on the list.</p>
<p>Yes, in a decade from now project management will look different from what we see now, but it won&#8217;t be dead. We&#8217;ll adjust the process to the new environment, like we always do.</p>
<p>And to answer your need &#8211; I believe you look in the wrong place. I think there&#8217;s no project management process which will help us sort the situation out. The answer lays in tools which will help to deal with communication among people spread all over the world. Think, teleconferencing tools are still very poor quality or very expensive (and even then, they aren&#8217;t very mobile). Our collaboration still relies on emails which aren&#8217;t always the best way of contact. Internet enabled spreading teams geographically but tools which would cover holes brought by the model are yet to appear. In my opinion that is the answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

